Font Size: A A A   Layout: Left | Right

greg hughes - dot net

Security, IT and anything else that matters... to me, that is



Sunday, October 01, 2006 4:12:04 PM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00) ( Photography | Random Stuff )

As I mentioned before. I recently acquired a Nikon D200 camera (new) and along with it a used but immaculate lens - the Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8 ED AF-S model. Both the body and the glass are exceptional pieces of equipment. I can't say enough about them. I also added the MB-D200 batter pack and extension to the body, which allows more battery time as well as vertical shooting trigger and wheels (mandatory in my book - I spent too many years with F3's and F4's not to have that capability).

I shot a few pictures out in the yard this afternoon to post here, since people have been asking me to do so. What I didn't realize until I uploaded them was that I had the ISO set to 800, which is ridiculously high for daylight, heh. So the image noise is a bit higher than it should be. But anyhow, they still look pretty good. The pictures below are clickable and will take you to my flickr feed, where you can see them in their full-size glory if you want to.

I highly recommend the D200 - I have not found a single thing I don't like about it yet (well okay it eats batteries for lunch, but hey - what can ya do?)

Japanese Maple leaf, backlit:

Red Maple Leaf

Diogi, my friendly (and spastic) chocolate lab:

Diogi, October 1 2006

Technorati tags: ,

Monday, October 02, 2006 3:19:56 AM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)
how's the lens weight wise? I've heard you need muscles on your muscles to use it!.
bg
Tuesday, October 03, 2006 1:31:55 PM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)
It's a bit heavy, yeah, but honestly a little weight and size in my book is a good thing. It makes for a much more stable photography platform when handheld, and for me smaller is not necessarily better - image quality is what I care about, and it's a great lens in that regard.

And muscles on your muscles? Heh. Not that bad. :)

Granted, it's 3.4" (88mm) around by 8.15" (207mm) long, weighs 3 pounds, 7 ounces (1,550g) and takes 77mm filters.

So yeah, it's a workhorse and not something to carry around for giggles.

See this page for some user-written details.
Friday, December 22, 2006 4:35:33 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)
I love what you have to say about the D200 since I just bought one along with a Nikkor AF-S 17-55mm
1:2.8 G ED. I got it about 2 weeks ago and have yet to use it out of fear. I've gotten a few books on it, and of course the manual that came with it. I'm wondering if you could give me some tips on the best way to get started? Thanks in advance for your time. By the way I like the images that you included in your post.
Thanks - Mark
Mark Sangerman
Friday, April 04, 2008 10:11:53 PM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)
Name
E-mail
Home page

Comment (HTML not allowed)  

Live Comment Preview
  

Navigation

Search

Categories

On this page

Archive

Send mail to the author(s) E-mail

Total Posts: 1695
This Year: 115
This Month: 8
This Week: 10
Comments: 2716

Sign In