Tuesday, September 25, 2007

I woke up a little early this morning to the smell of coffee (good way to wake up, eh?) and looked outside and decided to grab a camera and snap a couple hand-held shots from the front porch.

After shooting the pictures, and knowing the image would probably need to be cropped and that the long exposure (I had to do controlled breathing and steady the camera big time) would result in some shift in color and contrast, I figured this might be an interesting scene to look at in terms of in-camera composition, exposure and cropping. I used to do photography professionally and have been thinking a lot about getting back into it (non-professionally). This is a way of pushing myself in that direction.

I've included a few questions at the end, and I hope you'll use the comments to answer them with your thoughts. From time to time I'll do the same thing with other images.

(Note: You can click each image to view the larger size)

For illustrative purposes, here's the view the way the digital camera saw it and the way it wanted to expose the frame in "Program" mode (I've resized the image but it's otherwise unaltered). Note this is a great example of where automatic camera modes can result in substandard images. Program mode is not just easy, it's lazy. My opinion, anyhow...

    DSC_0054-crop0

Here's the same scene using a manual exposure, where the exposure is made primarily for the highlights. I bracketed a bit and this one had the best level of detail in the wide range of tonal values present in the scene. It's far from perfect, and the image was made in JPEG mode, not RAW, so it should be noted that right away we start the lossy process:

    DSC_0072-edit0

Here's how I remember the scene looking to my eye, or at least this is close (the image is an altered version of the above frame):

    DSC_0072-edit1a

I then made this crop to clean things up a bit and focus on what my mind was framing. Of the crops on this page it probably comes closest to obeying the "rule of thirds" as far as subject placement goes:

    DSC_0072-edit3

And this one is cropped even closer to show what my eye was truly drawn to. It still comes close to obeying the rule of thirds, but it not as strictly compliant:

    DSC_0072-edit5

So, what do you think works best and why? Do you have a preference? Why or why not? Would you crop it differently? How?



Add/Read: Comments [4]
Photography | Random Stuff
Tuesday, September 25, 2007 5:25:14 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)
#  Trackback

Referred by:
http://www.greghughes.net/ [Referral]
Wednesday, September 26, 2007 7:49:22 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)
Agree that trying to let the camera decide about light and/or color can result in very odd things compared to what your eye sees. I like your last crop the best as it is, but think the second to last crop would be much more dramatic when enlarged...if it didn't have the "white bucket" in the top left from the cloud. If that were "cloned" out, it wouldn't distract and the heavy sky would push your eye down into the real subject. Regardless, a beautiful view.
Robert Smith
Wednesday, September 26, 2007 3:22:42 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)
#3 could be used as a header as is - add some lettering.
tom novak
Thursday, September 27, 2007 9:16:32 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)
Hey Greg, I like your last one, but I have also recently been on a panoramic fascination. I also have a Nikon D100 but do not know how to use it so I like your posting and given your background I would really enjoy more of these postings, but that is just me being greedy. Hope all is treating you well.

Erik Dake
Erik
Thursday, September 27, 2007 6:18:59 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)
Thanks for the comments. Had not thought of it as a header, interesting. I'll try some more in the future.
Comments are closed.